VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

G.Chandramohan v. The District Revenue Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 February 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 4454/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy

Judgment

O R D E R

This Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 4 to consider the petitioner's representations/objections dated 30.12.2025, 06.01.2026 and 23.01.2026 within a time frame to be stipulated by this Court.

¶2By consent, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. Since no adverse order is going to be passed against the respondents 4 and 5, notice to them is dispensed with.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has already sent representations/objections before the respondents on 30.12.2025, 06.01.2026 and 23.01.2026, seeking to not to grant any No Objection Certificate or license to the 5th respondent in respect of the proposed crusher unit. Since the same were not considered till date, the petitioner has approached this Court.

¶4The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that the representation/objection of the petitioner dated 23.01.2026 would be considered in accordance with law.

¶5In view of the above, this Court, without going into the merits of the matter, directs the first respondent to consider and pass orders on the representation/objection of the petitioner dated 23.01.2026, on merits and in accordance with law, after issuing notice to the 5th respondent, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶6With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

18.02.2026 vsm Index : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No

TO

¶1The District Revenue Officer, O/o. the District Revenue Officer, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District..

¶2The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. the Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District..

¶3The Tahsildar,, O/o. the Tahsildar, Tiruchuli Taluk, Virudhunagar District..

¶4The Block Development Officer, O/o. the Block Development Officer, Tiruchuli Union, M. Reddiyapatti, Virudhunagar District.. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J vsm

WP(MD) No.4454 of 2026 Date : 18.02.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 18.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY G.Chandramohan ... Petitioner Vs 1. The District Revenue Officer, O/o. the District Revenue Officer, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. the Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District.. 3. The Tahsildar,, O/o. the Tahsildar, Tiruchuli Taluk, Virudhunagar District.. 4. The Block Development Officer, O/o. the Block Development Officer, Tiruchuli Union, M. Reddiyapatti, Virudhunagar District.. 5. Arumugam ... Respondents PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to consider the petitioner's representations/objections dated 30.12.2025, 06.01.2026 and 23.01.2026 within a time frame to be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 to R3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.