VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Abdul Majeed v. The Inspector of Police

ORDERED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 February 2023
Bench
A.D.Jagadish Chandiraauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 3841/2023

Judgment

O R D E R The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 352 and 506(i) of IPC and Section 4 of TNPHW Act in Crime No.38 of 2023 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution, as per the de-facto complainant, is that due to a family dispute, the petitioner has abused the de-facto complainant in filthy language and also tried to attack her and hence, the case.

3.The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and a false complaint has been given. He would also submit that petitioner has not committed any offence, as alleged by the prosecution. He would also submit that the petitioner has no previous cases pending against him and he is ready to abide by any stringent conditions, that may be imposed on him. Hence, he would seek for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that due to a family dispute, the petitioner has abused the de-facto complainant in filthy language and also tried to attack her. He would object for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5.Taking into consideration the facts and submissions and also on perusing the materials available on record including the F.I.R., this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Peravurani, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, every Saturday at 10.30 am until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC. sd/- 28/02/2023 / TRUE COPY / /03/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PERAVURANI. 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR AT KUMBAKONAM. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SETHUBAVACHATHIRAM POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.3841 of 2023 Date :28/02/2023 MGJ/SAR I/08/03/2023/3P/5C

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.02.2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRL.O.P(MD)No.3841 of 2023 Abdul Majeed ...Petitioner/Sole Accused -vs- The State represented by The State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Sethubavachathiram Police Station, Thanjavur District. (in Cr.No.38 of 2023) ...Respondent/Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C, praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent Police with respect to Cr.No.38 of 2023. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Bharathi For Respondent : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi Government Advocate (Crl.side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.