S.Rajkumar v. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Superintendent of Police, Theni,

ORDER The petitioner seeks for a direction to the 3rd respondent to conduct an enquiry and conclude the same pertaining to the complaint dated 04.12.2025 pending on the file of the third respondent police, based on the petitioner's representation dated 04.12.2025 within the stipulated time.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the de facto complainant, who lodged a complaint on 04.12.2025 regarding the swindling of 40 sovereigns of gold by the fourth respondent from the petitioner's gold jewellery shop, which is run in the name and style of Aatchi Bankers. However, there has been no progress in the investigation.

¶3The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent police submitted that, even as of today, the petitioner has not produced any evidence in support of the claim.

¶4Heard the learned counsel on either side and carefully perused the materials placed before this Court. Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed in this petition, notice to the fourth respondent is dispensed with.

¶5In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate, the petitioner is directed to produce adequate materials to substantiate the complaint that 40 sovereigns of gold were illegally taken away by the fourth respondent, including any available CCTV footage. The petitioner is at liberty to submit the same before the third respondent police after securing the originals. The third respondent is directed to consider the same, expedite the investigation, and complete it as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶6At this juncture, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the third respondent police station name is mistakenly mentioned as 'Theni Police Station' instead of 'Cumbum North Police Station'. Accordingly, the name of the police station is modified as 'Cumbum North Police Station'. Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in this regard.

¶7With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

19.02.2026 NCC : Yes / No

Index : Yes / No Sm TO:-

¶1The Superintendent of Police, Theni Superintendent of Police Office, Theni District.

¶2The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, District Crime Branch, Theni District.

¶3The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Cumbum North Police Station, Theni District.

¶4The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. Sm Dated

19.02.2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.02.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI S.Rajkumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Theni Superintendent of Police Office, Theni District. 2. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, District Crime Branch, Theni District. 3. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Cumbum North Police Station, Theni District. 4. R. Kumar ... Respondents (R3 is modified vide order of this Court dated 19.02.2026 passed in this petition.) PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 to direct the 3rd respondent to conduct an enquiry and conclude the same pertaining to the complaint dated 04.12.2025 pending on the file of the third respondent police station based on the petitioner's representation dated 04.12.2025 within the stipulated time. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vidhya Sagar For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar (R1 to R3) Government Advocate