Palavesamuthu.S v. The District Registrar

ORDER Heard both sides.

¶2The petitioner submitted the protest petition before the second respondent demanding that in respect of the petition mentioned survey number, the second respondent should not entertain any document for registration. The petitioner's request was negatived and the impugned communication dated

10.01.2022 was issued. The second respondent has set out in the said communication that the petitioner has not demonstrated his entitlement at all. Challenging the same, the present writ petition came to be filed.

¶3I wanted to know if the petitioner had enclosed his patta in the typed set of papers. No revenue document has been enclosed. The petitioner has not shown as to how he is entitled to the petition mentioned property. The reasons set out in the impugned communication are well founded. The impugned order is sustained. It is open to the petitioner to move the jurisdictional civil Court for appropriate relief.

¶4The Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.

11.10.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Registrar, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

2.The Sub Registrar, Vallioor Sub Registrar Office, Vallioor, Tirunelveli District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

11.10.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.Palavesamuthu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Registrar, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 2.The Sub Registrar, Vallioor Sub Registrar Office, Vallioor, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for entire records pertaining to the impugned order of the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.No. 22/2022, dated 10.01.2022 and QUASH the same as illegal and consequently to direct the 2nd respondent to reconsider and take the petitioner's protest petition, dated 07.01.2022 on the file of the office within a time frame, as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Santhana Krishnan For Respondents : Mr.S.Ra.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader