- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 19 February 2026
- Bench
- K. Surender
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 4653/2026
Judgment
ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 and 3 to update the Village revenue records in respect of the land in S.No.181/55 in Kulathupatti Group, Singampunari Taluk, Sivagangai District, by implementing the order passed by the third respondent in Na.Ka.A2/4890/2018, dated 20.05.2022, by considering the representation dated
03.03.2025.
¶2By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
¶3Since no adverse orders are going to be passed against the fourth respondent, notice to the fourth respondent is hereby dispensed with.
¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject property was assigned to the petitioner under the Landless Poor Scheme by the Government. However, the fourth respondent has claimed ownership of the property pursuant to Patta No.1407. Accordingly, the petitioner approached the third respondent, who, vide proceedings dated 20.05.2022, cancelled the Patta issued in favour of the fourth respondent and recommended to update the Village revenue records. Seeking to have the revenue records updated, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 03.03.2025. Since there has been no progress on the same, the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition.
¶5The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 submits that the petitioner's representation will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed on merits and in accordance with law.
¶6Recording the aforesaid submission, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 03.03.2025, and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The representation shall be considered and disposed of after conducting an enquiry. The second respondent is directed to provide reasonable opportunity during such enquiry to the petitioner, the fourth respondent and any other persons, who may be affected by such decision. Needless to state that in the event of any rival claims, the parties are at liberty to work out their remedies before the Civil Court. There shall be no order as to costs. NCC : Yes / No (K.SURENDER, J.) Index : Yes / No
19.02.2026 smn2 To:-
1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai Division, Sivagangai District.
3.The Tahsildhar, Singampunari Taluk, Sivagangai District. K.SURENDER
, J.
smn2
19.02.2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.02.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER Sakthivel ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai Division, Sivagangai District. 3.The Tahsildhar, Singampunari Taluk, Sivagangai District. 4.Chinna Azhagan ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 and 3 to update the Village revenue records in respect of the land in S.No.181/55 in Kulathupatti Group, Singampunari Taluk, Sivagangai District, by implementing the order passed by the third respondent in Na.Ka.A2/4890/2018, dated 20.05.2022, by considering the representation dated 03.03.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Jeyaram Sidharth For R1 to R3 : Mr.P.Subbraj Special Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.