- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 18 October 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 5866/2021
Judgment
O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the fifth respondent from in any way interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the property of the petitioner.
2.The grievance of the petitioner is that he is the absolute owner of the subject property and the fifth respondent was attempting to form a drainage through the subject property. Objections were made by the petitioner and in spite the same, the fifth respondent was attempting to interfere with his possession and enjoyment of the subject property. Under these circumstances, the present Writ Petition has been filed before this Court.
3.When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4 produced the written instructions received from the fourth respondent. For proper appreciation, the same is extracted hereunder: "Nj.fy;Yg;gl;b Cuhl;rp xd;wpak; nfQ;rk;gl;b Cuhl;rpapy; nfhy;ytPuk;gl;b cl;fil fpuhkj;ij Nrh;e;j jpU.md;gofd; vd;gth; nrhe;j ,lj;jpy; (rh;Nt vz; 235/1/B2)y;
fopT
ePh;
tha;f;fhy; mikf;fg;glTs;sjhf nrd;id cah;ePjpkd;wk; kJiu fpisapy; tof;F njhlh;e;Js;shh;. Mdhy; nfQ;rk;gl;b Cuhl;rp kd;wj;jiyth; mth;fs; kDjhuhpd; ,lj;jpy; Cuhl;rp eph;thfk; rhh;ghf ve;jtpj fopTePh; tha;f;fhYk; mikf;fg;gltpy;iy vd njhptpj;Js;shh; vd;w tpguj;jpid njhptpj;Jf;nfhs;fpNwd;."
4.The learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that there is no proposal to utilise the property of the petitioner to put up a drainage channel.
5.In the light of the written instructions given by the fourth respondent and after recording the submission of the learned Additional Government Pleader, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
6.It is brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner had submitted a planning permission before the fifth respondent and the same is pending by virtue of the pendency of this Writ Petition. In view of the disposal of this Writ Petition, the planning permission sought for by the petitioner shall be independently considered in accordance with law. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Index :Yes / No
18.10.2023 Internet :Yes / No NCC : Yes/No cmr To
1.The District Collector, O/o. the District Collector, Madurai District , Madurai.
2.The Personal Assistant to District Collector (Development), O/o. District Collector Office, Madurai District, Madurai.
3.The Assistant Director of Village Panchayat, O/o. the Assistant Director of Village Panchayat, Collectorate Campus, Madurai.
4.The Block Development Officer, O/o. the Block Development Office, T.Kallupatti Panchayat Union, Madurai District.
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.
cmr
18.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and W.M.P.(MD)No.4600 of 2021 N.N.Anbagalan ... Petitioner vs. 1.The District Collector, O/o. the District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Personal Assistant to District Collector (Development), O/o. District Collector Office, Madurai District, Madurai. 3.The Assistant Director of Village Panchayat, O/o. the Assistant Director of Village Panchayat, Collectorate Campus, Madurai. 4.The Block Development Officer, O/o. the Block Development Office, T.Kallupatti Panchayat Union, Madurai District. 5.The Panchayat President, Kenjampatti Village Panchayat, T.Kallupatti Panchayat Union, Madurai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to forbear the 5th respondent from in any way entering/digging the petitioner's land situated in S.Nos. 235/1B2 and 235/4 it consisting plots Nos.24, 25, 26A, 27A, 28 to 39, 42 to 44, 49(South) 50, 51, 54 to 57, 65 to 73(North) and 75 at Kollampatti Village, Kenjampatti Panchayat, T.Kallupatti, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District without any consent of the petitioner for any purpose and considering by the petitioner's representation dated 23.02.2021 within the period that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner :Mr.H.Mohammed Nihal for M/s.Ajmal Associates For R1 to R4 :Mr.B.Saravanan Additional Government Pleader For R5 :Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah *****
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.