VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

The State of Tamil Nadu v. M. Kandhavel

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
29 April 2026
Bench
N. Sathish Kumar, M.Jothiraman
Case no.
WA(MD) 603/2026

Judgment

JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) Challenging the order of the learned Single Judge dated

11.12.2024 passed in W.P(MD)No.28864 of 2024, the present writ appeal has been filed.

¶2Heard the learned Additional Government Pleader for the appellants and the learned counsel for the first respondent.

¶3The writ petition has been filed by the first respondent / writ petitioner stating that he was appointed as a Secondary Grade Teacher on

07.11.1997 with the qualification of B.Sc and B.Ed. The writ petitioner has undergone one month Child Psychology Training between

02.05.2003 and 31.05.2003. The authorities have approved the appointment of the writ petitioner as Secondary Grade Teacher with effect from 07.11.1997 onwards. The writ petitioner has attained the superannuation on 30.06.2024. When the pension proposals were forwarded to the 2nd respondent under the order impugned in the writ petition, the 2nd respondent has returned the same, stating that pension can be sanctioned only after excluding the period prior to the completion of Child Psychology Training. Challenging the same, the writ petition was filed. The Writ Court following the Division Bench judgment of this Court in State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Education Department Vs. Pallivasal Primary School, Represented by its Correspondent, Mudukulathur, [W.A.No.249 of 2002, dated

02.04.2004], allowed the writ petition by impugned order holding that that though the period during which the writ petitioner was not possessing the Child Psychology Certificate, cannot be considered for any other purpose, the same could be counted for the purposes of pension. As against the said order, the Government has filed this appeal.

¶4It is relevant to note that the judgment in Pallivasal Primary School's case (cited supra) has reached finality and in the said judgment, the issue was clearly held that the past service shall be calculated for the pension. Later, another Division Bench in W.A.(MD) No.1464 of 2021, vide order dated 28.07.2021 in the case of District Elementary Educational Officer, Tirunelveli and others vs. M.S.Shanthi and others has also followed the Pallivasal Primary School's case.

¶5In such view of the matter, as the past service is ordered to be counted for pension, we do not find any infirmity in the order of the learned Single Judge. Hence, Writ Appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [N.S.K., J.] & [M.J.R., J.]

29.04.2026 Index : Yes / No : Ye / No To

¶1The Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Department of Finance (Pension), Fort St George, Chennai 600 009.

¶2The Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

¶3The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai 600 006.

¶4The Chief Educational Officer, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District.

¶5The Headmaster, Government Higher Secondary School, Avudaiyar Koil Pudukottai – 614 618.

¶6The Accountant General, Office of the Accountant General, 261, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 018. oN.SATHISHoKUMARoo,oJo. AND M.JOTHIRAMAN,oJ. bala ORDERoMADEoIN WA(MD)No.603oofo2026 DATEDo:o29.04.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 29.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN and CMP(MD)No.5768 of 2026 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Department of Finance (Pension), Fort St George, Chennai 600 009. 2. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. 3. The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai 600 006. 4. The Chief Educational Officer, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District. 5. The Headmaster, Government Higher Secondary School, Avudaiyar Koil Pudukottai – 614 618. ... Appellants Vs. 1. M. Kandhavel 2. The Accountant General, Office of the Accountant General, 261, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 018. ... Respondents PRAYER :- Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order made in W.P(MD)No.28864 of 2024 dated 11.12.2024. For Appellants : Mr.J.Ashok Additional Government Pleader For R1 : Ms.A.Amala

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.