VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S. Girinivasaprasad v. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Kottar

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
23 February 2026
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 3833/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition is filed to set aside the order passed in M.P.Nos.10 and 11 of 2026 in S.C. No. 203 of 2022 dated

12.02.2026 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Court, Valliyoor and permit the petitioner to cross examine the witness P.W.1, P.W.2 to P.W.4.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is a sole accused in the pending trial in S.C.No.203 of 2022 on the file of the learned Assistant Sessions Court, Valliyoor, who is also a practicing Advocate. Two petitions in M.P.Nos.10 and 11 of 2026 were filed by the petitioner for recalling PW1, PW2 and PW4. The reason stated by the petitioner for recalling PW1 is that the prosecution has not mentioned about the records in Crime No.827 of 2011, that is CC No.9 of 2020. Therefore, P.W.1 was not cross-examined. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the reason for recalling P.W.2 to P.W.5 is that the records in Crime No.827/2011 ie., C.C.No.9 of 2020 and he is in need of those documents. However, the same was dismissed.

¶3The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that PW1 was examined on 12/11/2024, PW2 to PW4 were examined on 3/1/2026. Though the petitioner was present on that date in Court and being a lawyer, knowing the intricacies of criminal trial and law, without utilizing the opportunity to cross-examine PW1 to PW4 on the same day and without filing any application for cross-examination of witnesses, later, the petitioner had filed the said applications in MP Nos.10 and 11 of 2026. Only recording the same, the learned trial court had dismissed the applications and there is no infirmity in the same and sought for a dismissal of the Criminal Original Petitions.

¶4Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

¶5A careful perusal of the records would make it clear that there is no infirmity in the impugned order as rightly contended by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and that too the leanred trial court had dismissed the same ruling upon the judgment of the Honourable Apex Court in Vinod Kumar versus State of Punjab1 and Hariyana versus Ram Mahar2. However, for ends of fair trial, the impugned order is set aside and the learned trial Court is directed to afford opportunity to the petitioner to cross examine the witnesses PW1 to PW4 in a single slot to the same day without any further adjournment on payment of Rs.1000/- (Rupees One Thousand only) to each of the witnesses, as witness batta and on payment of Rs.5000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) for establishing an E-Library to the credit of the MBHAA, in Indian Bank, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Branch, Account No.496038755 IFSC No.IDIB000H040, MICR Code: 625019020. On such payment, the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Valliyoor, is directed to permit the petitioner to cross examine the witnesses P.W.1 to P.W.4.

¶6With the above direction, these Criminal Original Petitions are allowed. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

23.02.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No pnn 2015 (3) Crime SC 269 2017 (1) MLJ Crl. 437 To

1.The Inspector of Police, Kottar Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

2.The Assistant Sessions Court, Valliyoor.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. L. VICTORIA GOWRI,J pnn ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) Nos.3833 and 3834 of 2026 Date : 23/02/2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 23/02/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI and Crl M.P(MD)Nos.4122 and 4123 of 2026 S.Girinivasaprasad ... Petitioner in both Petitions Vs The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Kottar Police Station, Kanyakumari District. (Crime No.2190 of 2011) ... Respondent in both Petitions COMMON PRAYER :- To set aside the order passed in M.P.Nos. 10 and 11 of 2026 in S.C. No. 203 of 2022 dated 12.02.2026 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Court, Valliyoor and permit the petitioner to cross examine the witness P.W.1, P.W.2 and P.W.4. For Petitioner : Mr.SC.Herold Singh For Respondent : Mr.S.Ravi Additional Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.