VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

M. Karthick v. The Joint Commissioner of Labour

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 June 2025
Bench
R.Vijayakumarauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 5813/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow R.Vijayakumar

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.06.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR W.P.(MD).Nos.5813 and 15932 of 2025 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.4235, 12058 and 12059 of 2025 W.P.(MD)No.5813 of 2025: M.Karthick ... Petitioner Vs.

¶1The Joint Commissioner of Labour,

¶2P.Pradeep.

¶3A.Ganesan ... Respondents Prayer

: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of 1st respondent in E.C.No.114 of 2023 and quash the order dated 20.11.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Ravichandran For R1 : M/s.D.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader For R2 : Mr.J.Gunaseela Muthiah For R3 : Mr.A.Sankararama Subramanian W.P.(MD)No.15932 of 2025: A.Ganesan ... Petitioner Vs.

¶1The Joint Commissioner of Labour,

¶2P.Pradeep.

¶3M.Karthick ... Respondents Prayer

: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to impugned order dated 20.11.2024 in E.C.No.114 of 2023 was passed by the 1st respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Sankararama Subramanian For R1 : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh Additional Government Pleader For R2 : Mr.J.Gunaseela Muthiah For R3 : Mr.T.Ravichandran COMMON ORDER These two writ petitions have been filed by the respondents 1 and 2 in E.C.No.114 of 2023, on the file of the Joint Commissioner of Labour under the Employee's Compensation Act, Madurai, challenging the award passed by him on 20.11.2024.

¶2According to the learned counsels appearing for the writ petitioners, the statutory authority has not properly considered the submissions raised by them and therefore, the present writ petitions are maintainable.

¶3This Court is of the considered opinion that when an appeal remedy is provided under Section 30 of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923, the present writ petition is not maintainable.

¶4As far as W.P.(MD)No.5813 of 2025 is concerned, the period between 25.02.2025 till the date of receipt of the order shall stand excluded for the purpose of calculating limitation for filing an appeal.

¶5As far as W.P.(MD)No.15932 of 2025 is concerned, the period between 09.06.2025 till the date of receipt of the order shall stand excluded for the purpose of calculating limitation for filing an appeal.

¶6In view of the above said deliberations, both the writ petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file an appeal, if so advised. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

12.06.2025 NCC :yes/No Index :yes/No Internet:yes/No rgm Note: Registry is directed to return the original impugned order to the parties. To The Joint Commissioner of Labour, W.P.(MD)No.5813oofo2025 oR.VIJAYAKUMARoo,oJo. rgm W.P.(MD).Nos.5813oando15932oofo2025 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.4235,o12058oando12059oofo2025

12.06.2025

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.