VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Hemaram v. The State of Tamil Nadu

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
16 April 2026
Bench
N. Anand Venkateshauthor, K.K. Ramakrishnan
Case no.
HCP(MD) 238/2026

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by N. ANAND VENKATESH,J.) The petitioner is the brother of the detenu, by name, Hanumanram s/o Hemaram, aged about 21 years. The detenu has been detained by the second respondent by his order in Cr.M.P.No.93 of 2025, dated 31.10.2025 holding him to be a "Goonda", as contemplated under Section 2(f) of the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. The said order is under challenge in this Habeas Corpus Petition.

¶2We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents. We have also perused the records produced by the Detaining Authority.

¶3Apart from the other grounds raised by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, one of the main ground that was raised is that the detenu was arrested on 23.09.2025, whereas, the detention order was passed only on 31.10.2025. There is a delay of nearly 38 days in passing the detention order and this delay is totally unexplained.

¶4In our considered view, the issue is squarely covered by the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sushanta Kumar Banik Vs. State of Tripura and Others reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 1333.

¶5The detention order is vitiated due to the fact that there was a solitary case and the live and proximate link between the grounds of detention and the purpose of the detention is completely absent. Hence, this Court is inclined to interfere with the detained order passed by the second respondent.

¶6In the result, the Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the order of detention in Cr.M.P.No.93 of 2025, dated 31.10.2025, passed by the second respondent is set aside. The detenu, viz., Hanumanram, s/0 Hemaram, aged about 21 years, is directed to be released forthwith unless his detention is required in connection with any other case.

(N.A.V.,J..) (K.K.R.K.,J.,)

16.04.2026 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No TSG To

1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St.George, Chennai -600 009.

2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Trichy.

3.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District.

4.The Inspector of Police, Samayapuram Police Station, Tiruchirappali District.

5.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Tiruchirappalli District.

6.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

N. ANAND VENKATESH,J. AND K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN,J.

TSG

H.C.P.(MD)No.238 of 2026

16.04.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.04.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN H.C.P.(MD)No.238 of 2026 Hemaram .. Petitioner / father of the detenu Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St.George, Chennai -600 009. 2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Trichy. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District. 4.The Inspector of Police, Samayapuram Police Station, Tiruchirappali District. 5.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Tiruchirappalli District. .. Respondents Prayer :Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records relating to the detention order of the second respondent in Cr.M.P.No.93 of 2025 dated 31.10.2025 against Hanumanram s/o Hemaram, aged about 21 years, who is confined at Central Prison, Tiruchirappalli and set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu before this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sakthivel For Respondents : Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.