VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

P.Arumugam v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
25 February 2026
Bench
K. Surenderauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 5169/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 29.01.2024 as per Na.Ka.No.11/2024/A7, dated 13.02.2024.

¶2By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶3Since no adverse orders are going to be passed against the respondents 3 to 5, notice to the respondents 3 to 5 is hereby dispensed with.

¶4The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the subject property is ancestral in nature and that the petitioner and his family members are in peaceful possession and enjoyment thereof. While so, certain wrong entries have been made in the survey number. Seeking rectification of the said wrong entries, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 29.01.2024 before the first respondent, who, in turn, vide proceedings dated 13.02.2024, directed the second respondent to conduct an enquiry and submit a report. Thereafter, no action has been taken on the petitioner's representation. Hence, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.

¶5The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the petitioner's representation will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶6Recording the above submission, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.01.2024 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, the respondents 3 to 5 and any other persons, who may be affected by such decision, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. NCC : Yes / No (K.SURENDER, J.) Index : Yes / No

25.02.2026 smn2 To:-

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Palani, Dindigul District.

2.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Gujiliyamparai Taluk, Dindigul District. K.SURENDER

, J.

smn2

25.02.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.02.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER P.Arumugam ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Palani, Dindigul District. 2.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Gujiliyamparai Taluk, Dindigul District. 3.Perumayee 4.Ramachandran 5.Ravichandiran ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 29.01.2024 as per Na.Ka.No.11/2024/A7, dated 13.02.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.S.V.Muthusamundeeswaran For R1 and R2 : Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.