VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Geetha v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 February 2026
Bench
K. Surenderauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 5403/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to conduct enquiry and to cancel the Patta Nos. 1348 and 1421 stood in the name of the fourth respondent and to issue patta to the petitioner and her mother in respect of property in Survey Nos.493/1B measruing a total extent of 0.19.0 Ares and 492/1A measuring a total extent of 0.19.0 Ares, situated at Kalathur Village, Watrap Taluk, Viruthunagar District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 28.08.2025, within a stipulated time as framed by this Court.

¶2By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶3Since no adverse orders are going to be passed against the fourth respondent, notice to the fourth respondent is hereby dispensed with.

¶4The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the absolute owner of the subject properties. However, the Patta relating to the said properties stands in the name of the fourth respondent. Therefore, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 28.08.2025 to the respondents 1 to 3 seeking cancellation of the Patta and to issue Patta to her and her mother in respect of the subject properties. However, no action has been taken by the respondents 1 to 3. Hence, the present Writ Petition.

¶5The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that an enquiry will be conducted and appropriate orders will be passed on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶6Recording the above submission, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to conduct an enquiry and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, the fourth respondent and any other persons, who may be affected by such decision, within a period of sixteen weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. NCC : Yes / No (K.SURENDER, J.) Index : Yes / No

27.02.2026 smn2 To:-

¶1The District Collector, Viruthunagar District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivakasi Division, Viruthunagar District.

3.The Thasildar, Watrap Taluk, Viruthunagar District. K.SURENDER

, J.

smn2

27.02.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.02.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER Geetha ... Petitioner -vs- 1. The District Collector, Viruthunagar District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivakasi Division, Viruthunagar District. 3.The Thasildar, Watrap Taluk, Viruthunagar District. 4.Balu ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to conduct enquiry and to cancel the Patta Nos.1348 and 1421 stood in the name of the fourth respondent and to issue patta to the petitioner and her mother in respect of property in Survey Number 493/1B to the total extent of 0.19.0 Ares and 492/1A to the total extent of 0.19.0 Ares, situated at Kalathur Village, Watrap Taluk, Viruthunagar District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 28.08.2025, within a stipulated time as framed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Mohanasundaram For R1 to R3 : Mr.B.Ramanathan Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.