VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

S. Ramakrishnan v. Arumugam

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 April 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
CONT P(MD) 404/2023

Judgment

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.21299 of 2022 dated 22.09.2022 has been complied with. This Contempt Petition is closed.

20.04.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No NCC : Yes / No MGA

To

1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Limited, Bye-Pass Road, Madurai.

2.The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 02.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA in W.P(MD)No.21299 of 2022

20.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN in W.P(MD)No.21299 of 2022 S.Ramakrishnan ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs. 1.Arumugam, Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Limited, Bye-Pass Road, Madurai. 2.Bama, Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 02. ... Contemnors / Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for their wilful disobedience in complying with the order of this Court dated 22.09.2022 made in W.P(MD)No.21299 of 2022. For Petitioner : Mr.SP.Vijay Nivas For Respondents : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.