VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Alice Renet Vimala v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 February 2026
Bench
K. Surenderauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 5431/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to implement the proceedings of the first respondent in Ni.Mu.A5/4926/2024 dated 08.01.2025, in a proper manner and within the time limit stipulated by this Court.

¶2By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject property was bequeathed to the petitioner's husband under a registered Will vide Document No.8 of 2007. Suppressing the said Will, the petitioner's sister-in-law created false and forged documents and executed a settlement deed in favour of the petitioner's sister-in-law's husband, who in turn, again executed a sale deed in favour of the petitioner's sister-in-law. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner's husband filed a complaint before the first respondent and upon detailed enquiry, the first respondent found that the certificate relied upon was forged and never issued by the second respondent and directed the second respondent to cancel the Patta stands in the name of the petitioner's sister-in-law and restore the Patta in the name of the petitioner's husband's paternal uncle A.Daniel. Subsequently, the petitioner's husband died on 18.10.2023. However, no progress has been made thereafter. Hence, the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition.

¶4The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the second respondent requires twelve weeks' time to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶5Recording the above submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of, with a direction to the second respondent to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity to the petitioner and all other persons, who may be interested in the subject matter, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is also made clear that this Court has not expressed any of its views with regard to the merits of the matter and that it is open to the second respondent to consider the same on its own merits. There shall be no order as to costs. NCC : Yes / No (K.SURENDER, J.) Index : Yes / No

27.02.2026 smn2 To:- 1The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kanyakumari District, Collectorate, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

2.The Thasildar, Agastheeswaram Taluk, Kanyakumari District. K.SURENDER

, J.

smn2

27.02.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.02.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER Alice Renet Vimala ... Petitioner -vs- 1The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kanyakumari District, Collectorate, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 2.The Thasildar, Agastheeswaram Taluk, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to implement the proceedings of the first respondent in Ni.Mu.A5/4926/2024 dated 08.01.2025 in a spirit manner, within the stipulated time limit fixed by the this Court For Petitioner : Ms.M.Anbarasi For Respondents : Mr.P.Subbraj Special Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.