C. Gurubaran v. Vallinayagam (CONT P(MD) 586/2023)

Court: High Court of Madras
Decided: 9 June 2023
Bench: G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.: CONT P(MD) 586/2023

Official PDF Read full judgment Report an error

Judgment

ORDER The order passed by this Court has since been complied with. The contempt petition is closed.

09.06.2023 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No rmi To

1.The Tahsildar, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Taluk Surveyor, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District. Cont. P(MD)No.586 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.16110 of 2022

09.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

Cont. P(MD)No.586 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Cont. P(MD)No.586 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.16110 of 2022 C.Gurubaran ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Vallinayagam, The Tahsildar, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District. 2.Dinesh The Taluk Surveyor, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnor / respondents in accordance with law for his willful disobedience of the order dated 29.08.2022 in W.P.(MD)No.16110 of 2022. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Vijay Karthikeyan For Respondents : Mr.T.Villavankothai Additional Government Pleader Cont. P(MD)No.586 of 2023 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.