VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Kasirajan.R v. The Stae of Tamil Nadu Rep Its

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
4 March 2026
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 4760/2023

Judgment

ORDER The present Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent No.4 to cancel the bar of registration made in Document No. 40/2022 dated 04.07.2022 in respect of the petitioner's property in Survey No.371/2B at Ayan Reddiyapatti Village, Kariyapatti Taluk, Virudhunagar District, by considering his representation dated 24.02.2023 within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶2Admittedly, the petitioner has an ancestral property in Survey No. 371/2B to an extent of 1-20.17 Hectares.

3.The brief facts of the case are that several lands were purchased by PACL company, which subsequently failed to repay its investors. Therefore, proceedings were initiated by the appropriate authorities to repay the investors. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has passed an order for winding up and refund the investors' money. The said order was challenged before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT), Mumbai, which upheld the decision of the SEBI, vide order, dated

12.08.2015. Finally, the order was put to challenge before the Supreme Court in C.A.No.13301 of 2015 in the case of Subrata Bhattacharya Vs. Securities & Exchange Board of India, wherein the Honourable Supreme Court appointed Honourable Mr. Justice R.M.Lodha, former Chief Justice of India, for disposing of the properties purchased by the PACL.

4.The petitioner came to know that the petitioner's property is also included as the property of PACL Limited and an attachment order in Doc.No.40/2022, dated

04.07.2022 was passed by the 5th respondent without any notice or enquiry. Thereafter, the petitioner submitted a representation, dated 24.02.2023.

5.Since the matter is seized before the Honourable Mr. Justice R.M.Lodha, former Chief Justice of India, the petitioner is directed to submit a representation to the Honourable Mr. Justice R.M.Lodha, former Chief Justice of India, who in turn shall consider the petitioner's representation at the earliest.

¶6With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 04-03-2026 Tmg To

1.Inspector General Department of Registration No.100, Santhome High Road Chennai - 28.

¶2The Deputy Inspector General of Registration Department of Registration Vandikara Street Ramanathapuram

¶3The District Registrar Department of Registration Virudhunagar Virudhunagar District

¶4The Sub-registrar Office of the Sub-Registrar Aruppukottai Virudhunagar District

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY WP(MD) NO. 4760 of 2023 AND WMP(MD) NO. 4953 OF 2024 R.Kasirajan Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu rep its Inspector General Department of Registration No.100, Santhome High Road Chennai - 28. 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Registration Department of Registration Vandikara Street Ramanathapuram 3. The District Registrar Department of Registration Virudhunagar Virudhunagar District 4. The Sub-registrar Office of the Sub-Registrar Aruppukottai Virudhunagar District 5. Anitha Kenkarae General Manager (Nodal Officer cum Secretary) Office of Justice (Rtd) R.M.Lodha Committee (In the matter of PACL Limited) SEBI Bhavan Plot No.P-4A, B Block Bandra Kurla Complex Bandra - 8 Mumbai 400 051 Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Thirumurugan For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Shanmugavel, Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R4 Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent No.4 to cancel the bar of registration made in Document No.40/2022 dated 04.07.2022 in respect of the petitioner's property in Survey No.371/2B at Ayan Reddiyapatti Village, Kariyapatti Taluk, Virudhunagar District, by considering his representation dated 24.02.2023 within the time stipulated by this Court.

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.