VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

M/S.Sunrays Textiles Process Private Limited v. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 February 2026
Bench
K. Surenderauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 5289/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow K. Surender

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to complete the enquiry pending in Na.Ka.No. 7345/2025/A4 dated 17.10.2025 within a reasonable time to be fixed by this Court.

¶2With the consent of the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself, dispensing with the notice to the third and fourth respondents, as no adverse orders are proposed to be passed against them.

¶3The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner purchased land measuring an extent of 5 Acres and 12 Cents from one Kammal and the other legal heirs of Rakkayiammal. However, by mistake, the revenue authorities issued patta only to an extent of 1 Acre. Therefore, the petitioner filed a petition seeking rectification of the mistake and issuance Page No. 2 of 5 of patta for the entire extent. The first respondent issued summons dated

17.10.2025 in Na.Ka.No.7345/2025/A4 to the private respondents for enquiry. However, thereafter, no action has been taken to complete the enquiry or to pass any order. Hence, the petitioner has been constrained to file the present Writ Petition.

¶4The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first and second respondents, on instructions, would submit that the enquiry on the petitioner's petition would be completed and appropriate orders would be disposed of by the first respondent within a period of sixteen weeks.

¶5Recording the above submission and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to complete the enquiry on the petitioner's petition in Na.Ka.No.7345/2025/A4 and pass appropriate orders on its merits and in accordance with law within a period of sixteen weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The first respondent is also directed to provide a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, the private respondents and any other interested parties who may be Page No. 3 of 5 affected by such decision, before passing any order. There shall be no order as to costs. [K.SURENDER, J.]

27.02.2026 JEN Index : Yes / No To

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Melu, Madurai District.

2.The Tahsildar, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. Page No. 4 of 5 K.SURENDER

, J.

JEN

27.02.2026 Page No. 5 of 5

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER M/s.Sunrays Textiles Process Private Limited Represented through its Managing Director P.Rajasekar, S/o.Pariyalwar, 112, K.K.Nagar 4th Street, Madurai - 625 020. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Melu, Madurai District. 2.The Tahsildar, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. 3.Thiruvasagam 4.Raja Kohila ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to complete the enquiry pending in No.7345/2025/A4 dated 17.10.2025 within a reasonable time to be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian Page No. 1 of 5 For R1 & R2 : Mr.D.Sadiq Raja Additional Government Pleader *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.