- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 25 February 2026
- Bench
- K. Surender
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 5154/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow K. Surender
Judgment
ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to expedite the proceedings in Na.Ka.No. 10030/2023/A4, dated 29.07.2024, pending on the file of the respondent within a stipulated time frame to be fixed by this Court.
¶2By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the subject property originally belonged to one Sembulingam, the petitioner's grandfather, who died intestate and without any legal heirs. After his demise, Periyakaruppan, the brother of the petitioner's grandfather, was in possession and enjoyment of the property, and the patta in respect of the said property stood in his name. Upon his demise, the property devolved upon the petitioner's father, who was the sole legal heir of the said Periyakaruppan. After the demise of the petitioner's father, the petitioner and his siblings have been in possession and enjoyment of the said property. Seeking transfer of patta, the petitioner submitted an application dated
27.06.2023. Thereafter, on 29.07.2024, the respondent sent a communication directing the petitioner to produce all the relevant documents for effecting transfer of patta. Since no action has been taken thereafter, the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition.
¶4The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submitted that, if the petitioner submits all the required documents, the petitioner's representation will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed on merits and in accordance with law within the time frame to be fixed by this Court.
¶5Recording the above submission and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to submit all relevant documents before the respondent. Upon the petitioner producing all the relevant documents, the respondent shall consider the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to all the necessary parties concerned, within a period of sixteen (16) weeks thereafter. There shall be no order as to costs. NCC : Yes / No (K.SURENDER, J.) Index : Yes / No
25.02.2026 smn2 To:- The Tahsildar, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District. K.SURENDER
, J.
smn2
25.02.2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.02.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER Kasi ... Petitioner -vs- The Tahsildar, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to expedite the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.10030/2023/A4, dated 29.07.2024, pending on the file of the respondent within stipulated time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Rameshkumar For Respondent : Mr.B.Ramanathan Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.