VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Jeyaseelan v. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime Police,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
25 February 2026
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 4053/2026

Judgment

ORDER Seeking to direct the respondent police to comply with the order dated 25.09.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.22142 of 2025 in C.S.R.No.341 of 2025 by the Judicial Magistrate Court No.V, Trichy, this criminal original petition is filed.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had filed Crl.M.P.No.22142 of 2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Court No.V, Trichy, in which the learned Magistrate had passed an order on 25.09.2025 directing to retransfer the amount from column No.4 to column No.2 of respective accounts, from the amount stated in column No.3, which was fraudulently transferred. However, the same was not complied by the respondent police. Hence this petition.

¶3The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the respondent police had taken necessary steps to transfer money from the various defreezed bank accounts to the various victims on the direction of the various Courts other than this Court and from the Courts of other States. As on the date of the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, only an amount of Rs.50,000/- was available in the said account and the said amount was duly transferred to the petitioner's account.

¶4Heard the learned counsels on either side and carefully perused the materials available on record.

¶5It is seen from the nature of records placed before me that the entire fraud involved in the case is an online money fraud involving huge amount of money where umpteen number of victims were defrauded by the offenders. In this regard, though the petitioner had lost an amount of Rs.33 lakhs, the respondent police was able to transfer only Rs.50,000/- to his account due to the non-availability of the necessary funds in the freezed account. The petitioner is directed to take necessary steps by making suitable application before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Trichy and also lodging a fresh complaint to the respondent police in this regard for recovery of further money to which he is entitled. However, the respondent police is directed to produce the copy of the transaction slip by which they have already transferred Rs.50,000/- to the petitioner by serving the same on him in accordance with law.

¶6With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of.

25.02.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No gbg To

1.The Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime Police, Trichy.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

gbg

25.02.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Jeyaseelan ... Petitioner Vs. The Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime Police, Trichy, (Crime No.CSR.No.341/2025) ... Respondent Prayer : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to direct the respondent police to comply the order dated 25.09.2026 made in Crl.M.P.No.22142 of 2025 in C.S.R.No.341 of 2025 by the Judicial Magistrate Court No.V, Trichy. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Rajeswari For Respondent : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh Government Advocate(Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.