VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Shri Avantika Contractions (I) Ltd., v. Union of India

DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
4 October 2023
Bench
N. Anand Venkateshauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 5655/2020

Judgment

ORDER When the matter came up for hearing on 23.08.2023, the learned counsel for the petitioner reported no instructions and hence a direction was given to the registry to issue notice to the petitioner. Accordingly, notice has also been issued on the petitioner. Even today, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner.

¶2In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

04.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No sm

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. sm W.P.(MD)No.5655 of 2020 Dated:

04.10.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.(MD)No.5655 of 2020 Shri Avantika Contractors (I) Limited, Rep. By its Manager, M.L.Paranay Kumar Reddy. ... Petitioner /Vs./ 1.Union of India, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Rep by its Secretary, No.122-C, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi. 2.M/s.National Buildings Construction Corporation Ltd, Rep by its Chairman, NBCC Place, Pragati Vihar, Bhisma Pitamah Marg, New Delhi-110003. 3.M/s.National Buildings Construction Corporation Ltd, Rep by its General Manager, CISF Works, Amaravati Pudur, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District-630 031. 4.The Deputy Inspector General (Works), CISF South Zone Headquarters, Chennai-600 090. ... Respondents PRAYER:- Petition - filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Declaration, declaring the action of the respondents in levying liquidated damages after successful completion of Defect Liability period without affording an opportunity to writ petitioner as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional, violation of the principles of natural justice, principals audi alteram partem and in violation of the fundamental rights of the petitioner more particularly Article 14, 19(1)(g), Article 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently forbear the respondents from imposition of levy of liquidated damages and further directing the respondents 2 to 4 to pay the final bill submitted by the writ petitioner. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.S.Karthik (R1 & R4) Standing Counsel Mr.R.Suriyanarayanan (R2 & R3)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.