Malaichamy S v. The District Collector

ORDER When the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought leave of this Court and made the following endorsement: "Upon instructions from my client I may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition."

¶2Recording the said endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

08.06.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No pnn To

1.The District Collector, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

2.The Dindigul City Municipal Corporation, represented by its Commissioner, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. pnn

and W.M.P(MD)No.4617 of 2023

08.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN and W.M.P(MD)No.4617 of 2023 S.Malaichamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 2.The Dindigul City Municipal Corporation, represented by its Commissioner, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 3.D.Logapriyadharshini ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Declaration, to declare the confirmation made in favour of the respondent No.3 for the Shop No.3 at Kamaraj Bus stand New Complex as illegal and consequently direct the respondent No.2 to allot the same infavour of the petitioner within the time frame stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rajasekar For Respondents : Mr.N.Muthuvijayan Special Government Pleader for R.1 Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu Standing Counsel for R. 2 No appearance for R.3