VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

P.Mahakrishnan v. Velmurugan

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
15 June 2023
Bench
K.Murali Shankarauthor
Case no.
CRL MP(MD) 4177/2023

Judgment

CRL MP(MD) No.4177 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifteenth day of June Two Thousand and Twenty Three PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR CRL MP(MD) No.4177 of 2023 IN CRL RC(MD) No.288 of 2023 P.MAHAKRISHNAN ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER Vs 1 VELMURUGAN 2 THE STATE OF TAMILNADU REP BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, NAGERCOIL. ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to suspend the sentence imposed in STC No.1253/2015 dt.14/12/2017 on the file of Judicial Magistrate, Boothapandi as confirmed the same in Cr.A.No.186/2017 dt.10/2/2023 on the file of Additional Sessions (Fast Track), Nagercoil pending disposal of this Criminal Revision Petition. Prayer in CRL RC(MD). 288/ 2023 : To call for the records and set aside the order in Cr.A.No.186/2017 dt.10/2/2023 on the file of the Additional Sessions Court(Fast Track), Nagercoil confirming the order passed in STC No.1253/2015 dt.14/12/2017 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Boothapandi. Order : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.HEROLD SINGH S C, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.P.T.RAMESH RAJA, Advocate for the Respondent No.1 and of MR.A.ALBERT JAMES, Government Advocate (Crl. side) on behalf of the 2nd Respondent, the court made the following order:- When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent would submit that though this Court has passed an order dated 20.03.2023, the same was not complied with till now.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would CRL MP(MD) No.4177 of 2023 submit that the petitioner has not complied with the order of this Court as compromise talks were going on.

¶3It is seen from the records that this Court vide order dated

20.03.2023 while suspending the sentence directed the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of that order, but even after the lapse of three months, he has not complied with the order.

¶4In view of the above, this petition is dismissed. sd/- 15/06/2023 / TRUE COPY / /06/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. CSM TO 1 THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (FAST TRACK), NAGERCOIL. 2 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BHOOTHAPANDY. 3 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT AT NAGERCOIL. 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, STATE OF TAMILNADU, NAGERCOIL. 5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.4177 of 2023 IN CRL RC(MD) No.288 of 2023 Date :15/06/2023 ED/SSS/SAR- (21/06/2023) 2P 6C

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.