- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 16 October 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 6873/2021
Judgment
O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous.
¶2Recording the same, this Writ Petition is closed. No costs.
16.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No RM To
1.The District Revenue Officer Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o.Revenue Divisional Office, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District.
3.The Tahsildar Sivakasi Taluk, Sivakasi.
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. RM
16.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH S.Pandiarajan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o.Revenue Divisional Office, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Tahsildar Sivakasi Taluk, Sivakasi. 4.Jayaprakash ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to dispose the petitioner's appeal dated 21.12.2019 filed under the Tamil Nadu Patta Pass Book Act, pending on the file of the second respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Pragalathan For Respondents : Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia – for R1 to R3 Special Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.