VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Hakkim v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 April 2023
Bench
S Justice R. Tharaniauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 4896/2020

Judgment

O RDER

This petition is filed to quash the proceedings in P.R.C.No.2 of 2020, before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Alangudi

¶2The case against the petitioner is that the petitioner and others unlawfully assembled with deadly weapons and they abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and attacked him and also threatened him with dire consequences. A case in Crime No.118 of 2019, under Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 324, 506(ii) and 307 of I.P.C. was registered against seven named accused.

¶3On the side of the prosecution, it is stated that the F.I.R was registered only against seven accused. On the basis of confession of the co-accused, the petitioner was roped into the case as A9 and charge sheet was altered under Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 326, 506(ii), 307 and 149 of I.P.C.

¶4On the side of the petitioner, it is stated that there is no material available against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner was not mentioned in the F.I.R. There is no overt act against the petitioner, except the confession of co-accused, there is no ground to implead the petitioner.

¶5On the side of the prosecution, it is stated that the petitioner himself has given a confession statement. The petitioner has given a confession statement that he attacked one Ganesan and his brother and caused head injury to one of them. The trial has been commenced in this case, the allegation is serious in nature and the petitioner is liable to face the trial.

¶6Whether the petitioner is having any overt act, whether the petitioner has given a confession statement can be decided after the completion of the trial. The offence alleged against the petitioner is grievous in nature. In view of the same, this Petition is dismissed. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No

06.04.2023 Internet : Yes/No Ls R.THARANI. J. Ls To

1.The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Alangudi.

¶2The Inspector of Police, Alangudi Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

¶3The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

06.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.THARANI Crl.O.P.(MD) No.4896 of 2020 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.2834 of 2020 Hakkim ... Petitioner/Accused No.9 Vs. 1.The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Alangudi Police Station, Pudukkottai District. (Crime No.118 of 2019) ... 1st Respondent / Complainant 2.Ajithkumar ... 2nd Respondent/ Defacto complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records pertaining in P.R.C.No.2 of 2020, before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Alangudi and to quash the same as illegal against the petitioner. For Petitioner : Ms.A.Banumathy For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthikumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)for R1 : No appearance for R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.