S. Vijayaraj v. The District Collector

ORDER It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate for the respondents that the blacklisting of the petitioner has been removed and therefore, nothing survives for consideration in the above writ petition.

2.Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate, the Writ Petition is closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

Speaking : Yes / No

27.03.2023 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No mm To

1.The District Collector, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi.

2.The Commissioner, Kuruvikulam Panchayat Union, Kuruvikulam, Tenkasi District.

3.The Block Development Officer, Kuruvikulam Union, Tenkasi District.

P.T.ASHA, J. mm

27.03.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.5047 and 5048 of 2020 S.Vilayaraj ... Petitioner /vs./ 1.The District Collector, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi. 2.The Commissioner, Kuruvikulam Panchayat Union, Kuruvikulam, Tenkasi District. 3.The Block Development Officer, Kuruvikulam Union, Tenkasi District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to impugned proceedings vide Na.Ka.Aa2/3268/2019 dated 24.02.2020 passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct him to remove the petitioner's name from the Black list and provide opportunity in tender process. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Indrachithu For Respondents : Mr.J.John Rajadurai Government Advocate