VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Muthusamy R v. The Enforcement Officer, Trichy Ii, III and V Dns,

DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
15 July 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 5237/2023

Judgment

ORDER On 13.07.2026, when the Writ Petition came up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner and hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption "for dismissal". Accordingly, this Writ Petition is listed today under the caption "for dismissal". Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. In such circumstances, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the Writ Petition for non-prosecution.

2.Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

15.07.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No ps To

1.The Enforcement Officer, Trichy II, III and V DNS, Employees Provident Fund Office,

2.The Assistant Commissioner, Provident Fund Commissioner / Recovery Officer, Employees Provident Fund Office,

3.The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Regional Office,

4.The Chief General Manager (Telecom), BSNL Greems Road, Chennai.

5.The Assistant General Manager (HR & Admn), O/o. General Manager, BSNL, Trichy.

M.DHANDAPANI, J. ps

15.07.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P(MD)Nos.4930 & 4933 of 2023 R.Muthusamy ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Enforcement Officer, Trichy II, III and V DNS, Employees Provident Fund Office, 2.The Assistant Commissioner, Provident Fund Commissioner / Recovery Officer, Employees Provident Fund Office, 3.The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Regional Office, 4.The Chief General Manager (Telecom), BSNL Greems Road, Chennai. 5.The Assistant General Manager (HR & Admn), O/o. General Manager, BSNL, Trichy. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the three notices issued by the second respondent the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Recovery Officer, Employees Trichy as per Section 14 B dues letter No.Recovery/CB/RO-TRY/43778/SCN(CBTRY 22894)515/2021 dated 15.12.2021 for Rs.14,87,449/- (Rupees fourteen lakhs eighty seven thousand four hundred and forty nine only) interest to the petitioner and also subsequent penalty claiming from the petitioner as per the letter No.Recovery/CB/RO-TRY/43778/SCN(CBTRY 22894)2022 dated 31.01.2022 for Rs.14,87,449 (Rupees fourteen lakhs eighty seven thousand four hundred and forty nine only) also the first respondent Enforcement Officer Trichy – II, III & V DVN 43778/default/2023 dated 31.01.2023 Employees Provident Fund Office, Regional Office, Trichy has issued a letter No.CB/RO-TRY/Eo-II, III, &VDN/CBTRY43778/ AD(REC) /2022-23 dated 02.01.2023 for EPF default in payment of dues with interest and penalty under Section 7A & 7Q dues of the EPF & MP Act 1952 for Rs. 32,28,301/- (Rs.Thirty two lakhs twenty eight thousand three hundred and one only) claiming the payment of EPF contributions interest and penalty from the petitioner against the order dated 16.12.2020 of the Madras High Court Madurai Bench in W.P.(MD)Nos.10381 of 2020 and 10382 of 2020 and the order dated 28.04.2021 of the Madras High Court in W.P.Nos.34513 of 2019, 34570 of 2019 and 9515 of 2020 quash the same. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.I.Pinaygash (R1 to R3) Standing Counsel : Mr.D.Shanmugarajasethupathi (R4 & R5)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.