VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

S. Jeyakumar, v. Rajmohan,

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
23 March 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
CONT P(MD) 466/2023

Judgment

O R D E R The learned counsel on either side inform the Court that the order passed by this Court has been complied with.

2.Recording the said submission, the contempt petition is closed.

23.03.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias Cont.P.(MD)No.466 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.29247 of 2022

23.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Cont.P.(MD)No.466 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.29247 of 2022 S.Jeyakumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1. Rajmohan, The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Kumbakonam. 2.Sakthivel, The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Trichy Region, Trichy. 3.Raja, Branch Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Ariyalur Branch, Ariyallur. ... Contemnor Prayer: Contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for the wilful disobedience of contempt of the order passed by this Court in W.P. (MD).No.29247 of 2022 dated 12.01.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Anbarasu For Respondents : Mr.K.Jegadees Balan, Standing Counsel.

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.