- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 16 October 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 7061/2021
Judgment
O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous.
¶2Recording the same, this Writ Petition is closed. No costs.
16.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No RM To
1.The Income Tax Officer Intelligence and Criminal Investigation, Room No.A-305, 3rd Floor Annex Building, No.2, V.P.Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Madurai – 625 002.
2.Income Tax Officer (Exemptions), No.2, V.P.Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Madurai – 625002.
3.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (HQ) (Exemptions), Aayakarbhawan, Annexe III Floor, 121, M.G.Road, Chennai - 600034.
4.Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Central Public Information Officer, Uthamar Gandhi Salai No.46, Nungambakkam High Road, Nungambakkam,
5.Central Information Commission, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranthi Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, R.K.Puram, New Delhi - 110066.
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. RM
16.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Thamizhavel Thiru P.T.Rajan Commemoration Trust, Rep by its Trustee, No.26, Second Street, East Abhiramapuram, Mylapore, ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Income Tax Officer Intelligence and Criminal Investigation, Room No.A-305, 3rd Floor Annex Building, No.2, V.P.Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Madurai – 625 002. 2.Income Tax Officer (Exemptions), No.2, V.P.Rathinasamy Nadar Road, Madurai - 625002. 3.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (HQ) (Exemptions), Aayakarbhawan, Annexe III Floor, 121, M.G.Road, Chennai - 600034. 4.Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Central Public Information Officer, Uthamar Gandhi Salai No.46, Nungambakkam High Road, Nungambakkam, 5.Central Information Commission, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranthi Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, R.K.Puram, New Delhi - 110066. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the fifth respondents to consider in accordance with the law and pass appropriate orders in the Second Appeal under Section 19(3) of the RTI Act dated 27.07.2020 filed by the Petitioner, in a time bound manner. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Ponnu Pandi For Respondents : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar – for R1 to R4 Standing Counsel Tapal due – for R5
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.