- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 21 March 2023
- Bench
- P.T. Asha
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 5942/2020
Judgment
ORDER The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner is still continuing his contract with the first respondent and therefore, nothing survives for consideration in the writ petition.
¶2Recording the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
21.03.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To
1.The Managing Director, A.1245, Theni Agricultural Products Producers, Co-operative Sales Society, Opp. to Weekly Market, Periyakulam Road, Theni District.
2.The Deputy Registrar of Public Distribution, District Lorry Tender Administration Committee, Back side of District Collectorate Campus, Theni District.
3.The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative, Periyakulam Region, Vaigai Anai Salai, Periyakulam, Theni District. P.T.ASHA
, J.
mbi
21.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA N.Palpandi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Managing Director, A.1245, Theni Agricultural Products Producers, Co-operative Sales Society, Opp. to Weekly Market, Periyakulam Road, Theni District. 2.The Deputy Registrar of Public Distribution, District Lorry Tender Administration Committee, Back side of District Collectorate Campus, Theni District. 3.The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative, Periyakulam Region, Vaigai Anai Salai, Periyakulam, Theni District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 22.01.2020 pertaining to extending the contract for transporting civil supply in Bodinayakkanur Taluk through the lorry of the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.K.R.Laxman For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.