- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 27 February 2026
- Bench
- K. Surender
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 5484/2026
Judgment
ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the proceedings of the second respondent dated 10.09.2025 and to retain the petitioner's patta, which stands for more than 40 years in respect of the property comprised in S.No.24/10, measuring an extent of 2000 sq.ft., situated at Madurai East Taluk, Melamadai Bit 1 Village.
¶2By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
¶3Since no adverse orders are going to be passed against the third respondent, notice to the third respondent is hereby dispensed with.
¶4The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that without making any field visit and verifying the revenue records and also without calling upon the petitioner for enquiry, the impugned order came to be passed. The petitioner came to know about the impugned order only after obtaining information under the Right to Information Act.
¶5The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 submits that the impugned order does not indicate that the petitioner was put on notice prior to its issuance.
¶6A perusal of the impugned order dated 10.09.2025 shows that the petitioner was not put on notice before the same was passed. In the said circumstances, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the second respondent for fresh consideration. The second respondent shall pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, the third respondent, and any other persons who may be affected by such decision, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶7Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands allowed. No costs. NCC : Yes / No (K.SURENDER, J.) Index : Yes / No
27.02.2026 smn2 To:-
1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Collectorate Office, Madurai.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Melur, Madurai. K.SURENDER
, J.
smn2
27.02.2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.02.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER V.Kanniha ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Collectorate Office, Madurai. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Melur, Madurai. 3.N.Manikandan ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, challenging the impugned order passed by the second respondent is Ni.Mu.No.4736/2025/A4 dated 10.09.2025 as illegal and quash the same and retain the petitioner's patta which stands for more than 40 years in respect of Madurai East Taluk, Melamadai Bit 1 Village, Natham Patta S.No.24/10 to an extent of 2000 sq.ft. For Petitioner : Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan For R1 and R2 : Mr.N.Ramesh Arumugam Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.