VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Shanthi P v. The Tamil Nadu State Transport

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
23 March 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 5367/2023

Judgment

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The writ petitioner's husband joined the respondent corporation as miscellaneous Group-II employee in the year 1997. He retired from service on

26.04.1997. However, his terminal benefits were settled only on 04.02.2021.

3.It is well settled that for such belated settlement, the retired employee is entitled to interest. I, therefore, direct the respondent Corporation to pay the interest to the writ petitioner computed at the rate of 6% per annum on the belated disbursement from the date of retirement till date of settlement. The interest amount shall be paid within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4.This writ petition is allowed accordingly. No costs.

23.03.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

23.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN P.Shanthi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director, Madurai. 2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Virudhunagar Region, Virudhunagar. 3.The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-2. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to settle interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the belated payment of terminal benefits of the petitioner's husband late R.Ponnusamy including Gratuity, Commuted Value of Pension and Provident Fund from the date of his retirement to till the date on which the said benefits were settled. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rahul For Respondents : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.