VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

N.R.Chandrasekar v. The Superintendent of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 June 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 4694/2023

Judgment

ORDER This criminal original petition has been filed seeking direction to the 2nd respondent not to interfere with the civil dispute under the guise of enquiry and consequently direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner.

2.Direction was already issued to parties to appear before the second respondent on 28.04.2023 and co-operate with him to complete the process of enquiry. To inform the Court about the development, the matter was listed today. The learned counsel for the third respondent as well as the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the petitioner has not appeared before the second respondent. Since the petitioner has not complied the above said direction, this petition deserves no consideration. Let the respondent police complete the process of enquiry within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

3.With the above said directions, this criminal original petition stands dismissed.

09.06.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : TM To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.

2.The Inspector of Police Station, District Crime Branch, Thanjavur District

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN

,J.

TM

09.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.06.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN N.R.Chandrasekar .... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur. 2.The Inspector of Police Station, District Crime Branch, Thanjavur District 3. P. Karthikeyan 4. S. Ramanathan ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere with the civil dispute under the guise of enquiry and consequently direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.S. Gokul Raj For Respondents : Mr.S. Manikandan for R1 & R2 Government Advocate (Crl. Side) Mr. A. SenthilKumar for R3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.