VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

N.Anand v. The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 February 2026
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 4446/2026

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner seeks for a direction to the 1st respondent and their subordinates not to harass and not to ill-treat the petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry at the instance of the complainant.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that at the instance of the 3rd respondent, the respondent police is unnecessarily harassing the petitioner and hence, this petition came to be filed.

¶3The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that it is all a matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and the third respondent, who is none other than the wife of the petitioner. In this regard, a case in IDOP No.331 of 2022 is pending before the Family Court, Sivagangai. Only on receipt of the complaint from the third respondent, he was required to appear for enquiry.

¶4Heard the learned counsels on either side and carefully perused the materials available on record. Since no adverse order is proposed to be passed against the 3rd respondent, notice to her is dispensed with.

¶5This Court is conscious that under Section 528 BNSS, 2023, it may issue appropriate directions to ensure that police powers are exercised strictly in accordance with law and not in a manner that converts civil disputes into criminal proceedings without the essential ingredients of an offence being made out.

¶6In this regard, considering the nature of the case involved is a matrimonial dispute and to allay the petitioner's apprehension, and to ensure fairness, the second respondent police is directed to issue written summons/notice under Section 62 Cr.P.C / 64 BNSS, 2023, specifying the date, time, and purpose of enquiry and thereafter conduct the enquiry in a fair and impartial manner. The second respondent police are strictly directed not to cause any harassment to the petitioner. The petitioner, in turn, is directed to appear before the second respondent police, if duly summoned and to co-operate with the enquiry.

¶7With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

27.02.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Sm

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. Sm TO:-

¶1The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District.

¶2The Inspector of Police, Awps, Sivagangai.

¶2The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Dated

27.02.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.02.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI N.Anand ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Awps, Sivagangai. 3. M.Indhumathi ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking to direct the 1st respondent and their subordinates not to harass and not to ill treat the petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry at the instance of the complainant. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Chandra Sekar For Respondents : Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar (R1 & R2) Additional Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.