Muhamed Iqbal.K.A v. The District Collector

ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

16.03.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes abr To

1.The District Collector, Collector Office, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Superintendent of Police, The Department of SP Office, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Senior Zonal Manager, TASMAC Limited, Chepauk, Chennai.

4.The Assistant Commissioner (Excise), TASMAC Limited, Ramanathapuram District.

P.T.ASHA, J. abr Dated: 16.03.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA K.A.Muhamed Iqbal .. Petitioner Vs. 1.District Collector, Collector Office, Ramanathapuram District. 2.Superintendent of Police, The Department of SP Office, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Senior Zonal Manager, TASMAC Limited, Chepauk, Chennai. 4.Assistant Commissioner (Excise), TASMAC Limited, Ramanathapuram District. 5.R.Muthuramalingam 6.R.Madasamy .. Respondents Prayer :- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1, 3 and 4 to remove the TASMAC Shop No.6847 situated in the petitioner's land at Muthugulathur highway road at Muthugulathur Village in Survey No. 142/1 by considering the representation dated 25.02.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah For RR1 & 4 : Mr.A.Sivanupandian Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.S.Sivanesan Standing Counsel For R2 : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate