VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Lakshminarasimman v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 February 2026
Bench
K. Surenderauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 5486/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow K. Surender

Judgment

ORDER The Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to conduct enquiry and dispose the same by considering the representation made by the petitioner dated 22.09.2025 within the time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶3Since no adverse orders are going to be passed against the second respondent, notice to the second respondent is hereby dispensed with.

¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the subject property originally belonged to the petitioner's father and after his demise, during the UDR survey, the property was wrongly classified as Government Punja Land. Subsequently, assignment Patta was issued in favour of the second respondent, vide proceedings dated 31.12.1993. The second respondent, suppressing the material facts, illegally obtained the assignment Patta in respect of the petitioner's father's property and executed a sale deed in respect of third parties. Hence, the petitioner submitted a detailed representation dated 22.09.2025 to the first respondent seeking to cancel the assignment Patta. Despite the same, no enquiry has been conducted nor any action has been taken till date. Hence, the present Writ Petition.

¶5The learned Special Government Advocate appearing for the first respondent submits that the first respondent requires sixteen weeks' time to conduct an enquiry and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶6Recording the above submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of, with a direction to the first respondent to conduct an enquiry and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity to the petitioner, the second respondent and all other persons, who may be interested in the subject matter, within a period of sixteen weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is also made clear that this Court has not expressed any of its views with regard to the merits of the matter and that it is open to the first respondent to pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. NCC : Yes / No (K.SURENDER, J.) Index : Yes / No

27.02.2026 smn2 To:- The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Viruthunagar District. K.SURENDER

, J.

smn2

27.02.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.02.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER Lakshminarasimman ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Viruthunagar District. 2.P.S.Sakkarairaja ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to conduct enquiry and dispose the same by considering the representation made by the petitioner dated 22.09.2025 within the time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Jeyaram Sidharth For R1 : Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.