- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 23 March 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 5648/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
¶2The learned standing counsel brings to my notice the order dated
11.08.2022 made in W.P.(MD)No.13023 of 2022. The petitioner herein had filed this writ petition seeking some relief now sought for. The said writ petition was partly allowed. Therefore, the present writ petition may not really survive.
¶3The respondent is directed to comply with the direction made in W.P.
(MD)No.13023 of 2022. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
23.03.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
23.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN B.Murugan ... Petitioner Vs. The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Madurai Region, Rep.by its Managing Director, Madurai. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to pay the petitioner the amount payable towards the encashment of 120 days of earned leaves, surrendered by him in the years 2010 to 2017 before his retirement as admitted by the respondent in the RTI information dated 17.01.2022 either based on his monthly wages of the respective months of surrender of those earned leaves, together with 18% interest p.a. from the respective due dates or based on the monthly wages payable on the month of his retirement together 18% interest from the date of his retirement. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arunachalam For Respondents : Mr.Ramachandra Pradeep
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.