VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Chandrasekara Raja Ps v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 February 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 5618/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to forbear the 4th respondent from disturbing the peaceful possession of the petitioner's property in Survey Number 184, 186/3, 186/4B, 186/4C, 186/4D, 186/10A, 186/10B, 190, 191, 193 situated in Meerankulam Part II Village, Sathankulam Taluk, Thoothukudi District without following due procedure.

¶2By consent, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the 4th respondent, without obtaining any permission, has proposed to lay a power line corridor to transmit the electricity from KNPP through the petitioner's land. In this regard, the petitioner has already sent a representation on 13.09.2025 before the respondents. Since no action has been taken by the respondents till date to stop the said work, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition.

¶4The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that the representation of the petitioner would be considered in accordance with law.

¶5In view of the above, this Court, without going into the merits of the matter, directs the first respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 13.09.2025, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In the meantime, the parties are directed to maintain status quo as on today.

¶6With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

27.02.2026 Index : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No vsm TO

¶1The District Collector, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District.

¶2The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sathankulam, Thoothukudi District.

¶3The Tahsildar, Sathankulam, Thoothukudi District.

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. vsm WP(MD) No.5618 of 2026

Date : 27.02.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 27.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY P.S.Chandrasekara Raja ... Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sathankulam, Thoothukudi District. 3. The Tahsildar, Sathankulam, Thoothukudi District. 4. Powergrid Corporation of India Limited, Powergrid Kudankulam Transmission Limited, (Construction Area Office), Represented by its Manager, 400/230KV Sub Station, Abishekapatti Village, Near Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Vellalankulam Post, Tirunelveli – 627 012. ... Respondents PRAYER :- Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS, forbearing the 4th respondent from disturbing the peaceful possession of the petitioner's property in Survey Number 184, 186/3, 186/4B, 186/4C, 186/4D, 186/10A, 186/10B, 190, 191, 193 situated in Meerankulam Part II Village, Sathankulam Taluk, Thoothukudi District without following due procedure. For Petitioner : Mr.R.J.Karthick For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.S.Karthick Ramkumar for R4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.