VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Shriram Holiday Resorts v. The Tahsildar

DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 March 2023
Bench
P.T. Ashaauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 6564/2020

Judgment

ORDER When the matter was taken up for hearing on 20.03.2023, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal' today. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner.

¶2In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

28.03.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Kodaikkanal. P.T.ASHA

, J.

mbi

28.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA WP(MD)No.6564/2020 & WMP(MD)Nos.5913 & 5914/2020 Shriram Holiday Resorts Private Ltd., Rep. by its Director Ashok Kumar Shetty, AI-117, 8th Main Road, Anna Nagar, Chennai - 600 040. ... Petitioner Vs. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Kodaikkanal. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the notice in Na.Ka.No.4612/2019/Aa1, dated 24.01.2020, issued by the respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.J.John Rajadurai, Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.