Paramasivam A v. The Commissioner

JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.) We do not see any merit in the appeal. The Writ Court had dismissed the writ petition on the ground that an order of transfer simpliciter of another person cannot be challenged by the appellant/writ petitioner on the ground that it affects his promotional chance. If the appellant is entitled to and qualified for promotion, it is open to him to seek promotion. The appellant cannot question an order of transfer posting another person in the temple in which the appellant is working.

¶2Hence, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.) & (L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.)

31.03.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes bala

To

¶1The Commissioner, HR & CE Department, No.119, Uthammar Gandhi Salai, Nungampakkam, Chennai-34.

¶2The Joint Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Ellis Nagar, Madurai.

¶3The Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Ellis Nagar, Madurai.

¶4The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Dhandayuthapani Swamy Thirukoil, Madurai District. W.A(MD)No.364eofe2023

R.SUBRAMANIAN , J. and

L.VICTORIA GOWRI , J. balagg DATED : 31.03.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 31.03.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI and CMP(MD)No.4001 of 2023 A.Paramasivam ... Appellant vs. 1. The Commissioner, HR & CE Department, No.119, Uthammar Gandhi Salai, Nungampakkam, Chennai-34. 2. The Joint Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Ellis Nagar, Madurai. 3. The Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Ellis Nagar, Madurai. 4. The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Dhandayuthapani Swamy Thirukoil, Madurai District. 5. A.Arunraj ... Respondents PRAYER : Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order dated 15.02.2023 passed in W.P(MD)No.3060 of 2023. For Appellants : Mr.K.Muthu Ganesa Pandian For R1 to R3 : Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader