- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 9 June 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- CONT P(MD) 846/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
¶2The fence put up by the contemnor has been removed. The board installed by him has also been removed. It is for the petitioner herein to pursue final decree proceedings already initiated by him. I make it clear that the order passed by this Court for conducting survey will not in any way affect the rights of the petitioner herein. The contempt petition is closed.
09.06.2023 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No rmi Cont. P(MD)No.846 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.27712 of 2022
09.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
Cont. P(MD)No.846 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Cont. P(MD)No.846 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.27712 of 2022 P.Senthoorpandian ... Petitioner Vs. 1.C.Suyambu 2.R.Selvakumar The Tahsildar, Thoothukudi Taluk, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents herein for violation and disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.27712 of 2022, dated 08.12.2022 under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Mohamed Haneef For Respondents : Mr.K.Jegadeeswaran for R1 Cont. P(MD)No.846 of 2023 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.