VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S.Poomari v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
11 February 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 6897/2024

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.02.2024 for initiation of legal action against the respondents 7 to 9 for encashment of cash from the Panchayat Account maintained in the 5th Respondent Bank by means of forgery and fabrication of documents, and dispose of the same.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has given a representation on 19.02.2024 for initiation of legal action against the respondents 7 to 9 for encashment of cash from the Panchayat Account maintained in the 5th Respondent Bank by means of forgery and fabrication of documents. However, the same is yet to be considered. Hence, the Writ Petition.

¶3The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the representation submitted by the petitioner will be disposed within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶4In view of the same, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 19.02.2024 and dispose of the same, on its own merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶5With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

11.02.2026 Speaking / Non-speaking order Index : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No mbi To

¶1The District Collector, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi.

¶2The Assistant Director (Panchayat), District Collectorate Campus, Tenkasi.

¶3The Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi.

¶4The Block Development Officer, Keelapavoor,

¶5The President,

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. mbi

11.02.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY S.Poomari ...Petitioner vs. 1. The District Collector, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi. 2. The Assistant Director (Panchayat), District Collectorate Campus, Tenkasi. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi. 4. The Block Development Officer, Keelapavoor, 5. The Branch Manager, Tamil Nadu Grama Bank, Surandai Branch, Surandai, Tenkasi District. 6. The President, 7. Murugan, President, 8. Muthumari, Secretary, 9. Thangadurai, Member of Ward No.3, ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st Respondent to consider the Petitioner's representation dated 19.02.2024 for initiation of appropriate legal action the respondents 7 to 9 for the encashment of cash from the Panchayat Account being maintained in the 5th Respondent Bank by means of forgery, fabricating false documents and using false documents as if genuine and dispose of the same within a stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Saravanakumar For Respondents : Mr.A.Oliraja, Government Advocate for R1 & R2 Mr.A.Albert James, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R3 Mr.J.Ashok, Additional Government Pleader for R4, R7 Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu for R5 No appearance for R6 and R8

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.