- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 21 March 2023
- Bench
- R. Subramanian, S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 6148/2023
Judgment
O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.] Mr.R.Pandivel, learned Standing Counsel, takes notice for the respondent – Bank.
¶2The sale notice, dated 02.03.2023, issued by the respondent – Bank, under Rule 8 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, is under challenge in this writ petition.
¶3While the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the earlier conditional order was promptly complied with by the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent – Bank would submit that though the earlier conditional order was complied with, the petitioner did not come forward to pay the balance amount. The learned Standing Counsel would add that as on date the amount due is Rs.16,87,132/- (Rupees sixteen lakhs eighty seven thousand one hundred and thirty two only).
¶4The sale is to be held on 28.03.2023.
¶5The respondent – Bank can proceed with the sale, but it shall not confirm the sale, if the petitioner pays a sum of Rs.5,50,000/- (Rupees five lakhs and fifty thousand only) to the respondent – Bank, on or before
30.03.2023.
¶6The balance amount shall be paid by the petitioner in four equated monthly installments commencing from April, 2023. The monthly instalments shall be paid on or before 20th of every succeeding month.
¶7The interest payable for the interregnum period and the cost of the sale shall be paid along with the last installment.
¶8The respondent – Bank can proceed to confirm the sale, if there is a default in payment of any one of the monthly installments.
¶9The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
[R.S.M., J.] [L.V.G., J.]
21.03.2023 NCC : Index : Internet :
krk R.SUBRAMANIAN , J . and L.VICTORIA GOWRI , J . krk and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.5863 & 5864 of 2023
21.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.5863 & 5864 of 2023 S.Kannan ... Petitioner -vs- The Authorised Officer Union Bank of India Dindigul Branch 1st Floor, Jeeva Jothi Big Salai Road Dindigul-624 001 ... Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to impugned sale notice dated 02.03.2023 issued by the respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Mathan For Respondent : Mr.R.Pandivel, Standing Counsel
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.