S. Revathi, v. N. Petchiammal,

ORDER

C.R.P(MD)No.1030 of 2023 has been filed against the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.7 of 2022 in O.S.No.237 of 2015, dated

06.12.2012 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Tirunelveli.

¶2C.R.P(MD)No.1031 of 2023 has been filed against the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.8 of 2022 in O.S.No.237 of 2015, dated

06.12.2012 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Tirunelveli.

¶3The petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.237 of 2016 before the Principal Sub Court, Tirunelveli. The said suit has been filed by the petitioner for partition of the suit schedule property.

¶4After the trial was complete, the petitioner herein filed I.A.Nos. 7 and 8 of 2022 for re-opening the evidence and for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to take blood sample of the petitioner for comparison with the blood sample of the third respondent/third defendant, namely, Maragatha Murugan, who according to the petitioner is not the son of the petitioner's father. It is submitted that the third respondent/third defendant was not sired by her father and that due to the old age of the petitioner's father, the third respondent/third defendant's mother, who was working as a domestic helper took advantage of the proximity.

¶5The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had earlier filed I.A.No.3 of 2020 to amend the plaint, which came to be dismissed on 17.11.2021. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the attempts have been made to set aside the order dismissing the application for amending the plaint vide order, dated 17.11.2021.

¶6I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶7A reading of the plaint filed in O.S.No.237 of 2015 indicates that the petitioner has not questioned the factum that the third respondent is her half brother. In fact, the petitioner has made the third defendant as a party to the suit as otherwise it would not have been necessary for the petitioner even implead the third defendant as a defendant in the suit. The application has been filed belatedly. Therefore, the Principal Sub Court, Tirunelveli, has dismissed the application filed by the petitioner with the following observations: "8. ,Ujug;G thjk; kw;Wk; Mtzq;fspd; mbg;gilapy; ghh;itapLk; nghOJ mry; tof;fhdJ ghf gphptpid kw;Wk; Mtzq;fis nry;yhJ vd tpsk;Gif nra;a

Nfhhp

kDjhuuhd

thjpahy;

jhf;fy; nra;ag;gl;L ,Ujug;G rhl;rp tprhuiz KbT ngw;W tof;fwpQh;

thJiuf;fhf

tha;jh

Vw;gl;l epiyapy;> ,k;kDf;fs; jhf;fy; nra;ag;gl;Ls;sJ.

¶9thjp jug;gpy; ,we;J Nghd eluh[gps;isapd; kfd; 3k; gpujpthjp ,y;iy vd;Wk;> mij ep&gzk; nra;a DNA ghpNrhjid Nfhhp Mizah; epakdk; nra;a ,k;kD jhf;fy;

nra;ag;gl;Ls;sJ.

thjp

jd;Dila tof;FiuapNyNa ,we;J Nghd eluh[gps;isf;Fk; 1k; gpujpthjpf;Fk; gpwe;j thhpR jhd; 3k; gpujpthjp vd nrhy;ypAs;shh;. gpd;dh; tof;F tprhuizf;F gl;baypl;l NghJ me;j rq;fjpfis khw;wp 3k; gpujpthjp 1k; gpujpthjpapd; Kjy; fztUf;F gpwe;j kfd; vd rPh;jpUj;jk; nra;a mDkjp Nfhhp jhf;fy; nra;j rPh;jpUj;j kD ,.k.vz.3/2020> 17.11.2021k; Njjpapl;L js;Sgb nra;ag;gl;Ls;sJ. mjw;F gpd;G thjp jug;gpy; ve;jtpj Nky;KiwaPLk; nra;ag;gltpy;iy. mt;thWs;s epiyapy;> thjp

tof;Fiu

mbg;gilapy;

,we;J

Nghd eluh[ gps;isf;Fk; 1k; gpujpthjpf;Fk; gpwe;j thhpR 3k; gpujpthjp vd xg;Gf;nfhs;sg;gl;Ls;s epiyapy;> jw;NghJ mjw;F tpNuhjkhf mth; eluh[gps;isf;F gpwf;ftpy;iy vd ep&gzk; nra;a DNA ghpNrhjid nra;a NfhUtJ rl;lg;gbAk;

epahag;gbAk; Vw;Wf;nfhs;Sk;gbahdjhf ,y;iy.

¶10thjp ,we;J Nghd eluh[ gps;isapd; thhpR rhd;wpjo; th.rh.M.13 Mf jhf;fy; nra;ag;gl;Ls;sJ. mjpy; 3k; gpujpthjpAk; mtUila thhpR vd;Nw fhl;lg;gl;Ls;sJ. mJ Fwpj;J thjp jug;gpy; tUtha; Jiwapy; nfhLf;fg;gLk; thhpR rhd;wpjo; xU thhpRjhuiu ep&gzk; nra;a Mjhukhf vLj;Jf; nfhs;sf; $lhJ vd njhptpf;fg;gl;lJ. mJ cz;ikahdJ jhd;. NkYk; gpujpthjpfs; jug;gpy; chpikapay;

tof;fpy;

xU

jug;gpdh;

kw;w jug;gpdUila ,uj;j khjphpia DNA ghpNrhjid nra;tjw;fhf fl;lhag;gLj;j KbahJ vd njhptpf;fg;gl;L> mjw;F Mjuthf nfhy;fj;jh cah;ePjpkd;w Kd; jPh;g;Giu Mahmudul Hasan Akbar Zaidi @ M.H.Akbar Zaidi and others Vs. Mahmuda Begum (Dead) Her legal representatives Iqbal Hossain and others C.O.No.200 of 2019, dated 25.01.2022 jhf;fy; nra;ag;gl;lJ. Nkw;fz;l Kd; jPh;g;Giuapy; DNA ghpNrhjid nra;a xUtiu fl;lhag;gLj;j KbahJ vd njhptpf;fg;gl;Ls;sJ njhpatUfpwJ.

11.

Nkw;fz;l

fhuzq;fspd;

mbg;gilapy; ghh;itapLk; nghOJ ,Ujug;G tof;F #o;epiyapd; mbg;gilapYk;> thjpahy; tof;Fiuapy; xg;Gf;nfhs;sg;gl;l rq;fjpfspd; mbg;gilapYk; ,e;j tof;F tprhuizf;F thjp kDtpy; NfhhpAs;sthW DNA ghpNrhjid mwpf;if mtrpakw;wjhFk;.

vdNt

,k;kDf;fs;

js;Sgb nra;aj;jf;fjhf ,e;j gpur;ridfSf;F jPh;T fhzg;gLfpwJ.

¶12Kbthf> ,k;kD js;Sgb nra;ag;gLfpwJ. nryTj;njhif ,y;iy."

¶8I do not find any reason to interfere with the order passed in I.A.No.7 of 2022. The application was filed when the case was listed for argument after recording of evidence. Consequently, C.R.P(MD)No.1031 of 2023 against the order passed in I.A.No.8 of 2022 is also not maintainable.

¶9Therefore, the present Civil Revision Petitions stand dismissed with the above observations. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

18.04.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No sn To

1.The Principal Sub Court, Tirunelveli.

2.The Section Officer Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. C.SARAVANAN

,J.

SN C.R.P(MD)Nos.1030 and 1031 of 2023

18.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.04.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and C.M.P(MD)Nos.4844 and 4846 of 2023 C.R.P(MD)No.1030 of 2023 S.Revathi ...Revision Petitioner/ Petitioner/Plaintiff Vs. 1.N.Petchiammal 2.Sanakran 3.N.Maragatha Murugan 4.Alagu Sundari @ Sundari 5.Chidhambaram 6.Sanakara Vadivoo 7.Alwar Ganesh 8.Sankran Pillai ... Respondents/Respondents/ Defendants PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.7 of 2022 in O.S.No.237 of 2015, dated 06.12.2012 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Tirunelveli. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kumar C.R.P(MD)No.1031 of 2023 S.Revathi ...Revision Petitioner/ Petitioner/Plaintiff Vs. 1.N.Petchiammal 2.Sanakran 3.N.Maragatha Murugan 4.Alagu Sundari @ Sundari 5.Chidhambaram 6.Sanakara Vadivoo 7.Alwar Ganesh 8.Sankran Pillai ... Respondents/Respondents/ Defendants PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.8 of 2022 in O.S.No.237 of 2015, dated 06.12.2012 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Tirunelveli. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kumar COMMON