Kamala Devi v. The Tahsildar

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The petitioner is said to have participated in the selection process for the post of Village Assistant. The petitioner claims that she is a destitute widow and having responsibility to maintain her two children also. On this ground, it would not be proper for this Court to direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Village Assistant.

¶3The learned Special Government Pleader informs the Court that the petitioner's application will be processed along with that of other eligible candidates and decision will be taken in the matter on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six weeks.

¶4Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

20.03.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Melur, Madurai.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Melur, Madurai.

3.The District Collector, Collectorate Campus, Madurai.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

20.03.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Kamala Devi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Melur, Madurai. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Melur, Madurai. 3.The District Collector, Collectorate Campus, Madurai. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 16.02.2023 claiming her appointment as Village Assistant within a period stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Amritha for Mr.E.Mohamed Abbas For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader