VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Pradeep Kumar .B v. The Superintendent of Police

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
23 March 2023
Bench
R. Subramanianauthor, B.Pugalendhi
Case no.
WP(MD) 6316/2023

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J) The petitioner seeks for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent to take action against the fourth respondent on the basis of his representation dated 21.02.2023.

2.Mr.K.R.Laxman, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry Bar Council, the third respondent herein, would submit that representation has been made to the Bar Council only on

21.02.2023 and the Bar Council will definitely take action at the earliest.

3.Recording the said submission of the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry Bar Council, this Writ Petition is closed. No costs. [R.S.M., J.] & [B.P., J.]

23.03.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes skn R.SUBRAMANIAN., J AND B.PUGALENDHI

., J

skn

23.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI B.Pradeep Kumar : Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Theni, Theni District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Allinagaram Police Station, Theni, Theni District. 3.The Chairman, The Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry Bar Council, Chennai. 4.R.Raja : Respondents PRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent to take action against the fourth respondent on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 21.02.2023 within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Jeganathan For Respondent : Mr.Verenthiran Govt. Advocate for R1 and R2 Mr.K.R.Laxman Standing Counsel for R3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.