Prabakaran v. The Superintendent of Police

ORDER This petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondents 1 and 2 not to harass the Petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry.

¶2Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondents.

¶3Since it is a matrimonial dispute between the husband and wife, for exploring the possibility of settlement, notice was issued to the 3rd respondent. Even though the notice was served on the third respondent no one has appeared.

¶4Perusal of the CD file it is seen that during the course of enquiry, both sides appeared and the husband, who is the petitioner herein gave an undertaking that he will not cause any trouble to his wife, similarly, he also returned the Two Wheeler and 10 sovereigns of gold jewels within a month. On the basis of the understanding reached between the parties, the above said complaint was closed.

¶5Since already some understanding is reached between the parties the petitioner must comply the undertaking. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is also ready to comply the above said undertaking and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in this petition.

¶6Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

15.06.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes/No trp To

¶1The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District. Sivagangai

¶2The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Manamadurai, Sivagangai District

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN, J., trp

15.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.06.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Prabakaran ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District. Sivagangai 2. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Manamadurai, Sivagangai District 3. Madhumitha .....Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the Respondents no. 1 to 2 not to harass the Petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry. For Petitioner : Mr. Pon Karthikeyan R For Respondents 1 &2 : Mr. Suresh Kumar .R Government Advocate (Criminal Side)