- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 13 June 2023
- Bench
- C.V. Karthikeyan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 6050/2023
Judgment
ORDER The issue raised in the writ petition has become infructuous since by the impugned order, restraint was given on the petitioner to sell insecticides, for a period of 7 days. The 7 day period has expired. The writ petition therefore, stands dismissed. However, if ever the respondent seek to initiate any action in future against the petitioner, let them do so after issuing show cause notice and following proper procedures. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands dismissed.
13.06.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No pnn To
1.The Joint Director of Agriculture, Dindigul, Dindigul District.
2.The Assistant Director of Agriculture, Palani, Dindigul District.
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. pnn
13.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN and W.M.P.(MD) No.5702 of 2023 Thennarasu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Joint Director of Agriculture, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 2.The Assistant Director of Agriculture, Palani, Dindigul District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the second respondent through her proceedings in Say.Mu.Aa.No.AA.51/2022-2023 dated 14.03.2023 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Venkatesh For Respondents : Mr.M.Muthuvijayan Special Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.