VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Jeeva .M v. The Managing Director

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
31 March 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 6190/2023

Judgment

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The petitioner is a retired employee of the respondent corporation. He retired on 31.12.2022. All that the petitioner seeks is settlement of his retirement benefits. Since they have not been settled, the present writ petition came to be filed.

3.The stand of the Management is that on account of the financial difficulties in the Corporation, it is unable to make the payment. The reason given by the Management is unacceptable. When the employee has been allowed to retire his benefits ought to be paid immediately thereafter. At best the Management can take maximum of thirty days. I therefore direct the respondents to settle the petition mentioned retiral benefits as expeditiously as possible. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is in emergent need of funds to meet his medical expenses.

4.I direct the respondent Management to settle 30% of the petitioner's gratuity amount within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The remaining amount shall be settled within a period of three months thereafter.

5.This writ petition is allowed on these terms. There shall be no order as to costs.

31.03.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The Managing Director, New Railway Station Road,

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

2.The General Manager, Kumbakonam Region,

3.The Administrator, Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Saalai, Chennai – 2.

31.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 31.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN M.Jeeva ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Managing Director, New Railway Station Road, 2.The General Manager, Kumbakonam Region, 3.The Administrator, Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Saalai, Chennai – 2. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to settle the Gratuity Rs.7,34,732/-, Leave Salary Rs.41,098/-, Earned Leave Surrender Salary Rs.3,274/-, Cess Amount Rs.1,00,000/-, RBS Rs.18,500/- IRT Refund amount Rs.4,270/- and Provident Fund Rs.10,32,716/- along with belated payment interest at the rate of 6 percentage p.a on the delayed payment of retirement benefits form the date of retirement on 31.12.2022 till the date of settlement. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Govindan For Respondents : Mr.K.Jagadeesbalan Standing Counsel for R.1 & R.2 Mr.S.C.Herold Singh Standing Counsel for R.3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.