VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Veeramani v. M/S.Sar Enterprises

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 March 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 5537/2023

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for the records in Cr.M.P.No.220/2023 in CC 286/2017 dated on 08/03/2023 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District and set aside the same.

¶2Reading of the order of the trial Court shows that the petitioner was put to question under section 313(1)(b) of Cr.P.C., on 02.08.2019, and after lapse of three years, the Cr.M.P. No.220 of 2023 in C.C.No.286 of 2017 has been filed. Inspite of innumerable opportunities, the petitioner has failed to let in evidence, so the trial Court has closed the accused side evidence on 26.12.2022 and the matter was posted for arguments. After that the petitioner has come up to re-open the accused side evidence, but however the accused has failed to put forth any reason for summoning the said witnesses and the relevancy of the witness to the said case.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the due to COVID-19 lockdown, the petitioner could not explain the reason for summoning the accused side witness.

¶4Since the petitioner is facing charges under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act and on considering the grievance of the petitioner, let one more opportunity be given to the petitioner on stringent condition. The petitioner is directed to pay Rs.5,000/- (Five Thousand Only) as cost to the complainant before the trial Court within a week from the date of receipt of copy of this order. On cost of deposit, the trial Court is directed to give one more opportunity to the petitioner to produce witness by fixing a particular date. On that date the petitioner must produce the accused side witness without fail. If any failure is noticed on the part of the petitioner, his further right will be forfeited forever.

¶6With the above said direction, this petition stands allowed.

24.03.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : Indu To The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN

,J.

Indu Dated: 24.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.03.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Veeramani ... Petitioner/Accused Vs. M/s.SAR Enterprises, Through its Proprietor, Mr.S.Albert Rayan, Represented through his power agent Mr.A.Periyasamy. ... Respondent/Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in Cr.M.P.No.220/2023 in CC 286/2017 dated on 08/03/2023 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District and set aside the same. For Petitioner : Mr.Ka.Raamakrishnan

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.