- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 15 June 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan, B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 8105/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents. Though notice has been served to the sixth respondent, it has not chosen to enter appearance.
¶2The grievance of the petitioner is that the sixth respondent had been allowed to form a road on a water body.
¶3When the matter was taken up for final hearing, it has been clarified by the official respondents that the sixth respondent was given only 30 days to use the water body in question to transport materials and that the said period has since expired and that the original period has since been restored. Recording the said development, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
[G.R.S., J.] [B.P., J.]
15.06.2023 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No MGA To
1.The District Collector, Kokkirankulam, Tirunelveli – 627 001.
2.The Tahsildar. Tahsildar Office, Manur, Tirunelveli. G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J and
B.PUGALENDHI, J. MGA
3.The Public Works Department, Sitraru Vadinilakottam, Tenkasi.
4.The Village Assistant Officer, Vadakkuvagaiguam, Tirunelveli – 627 202.
15.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI T.Jebamani ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Kokkirankulam, Tirunelveli – 627 001. 2.The Tahsildar. Tahsildar Office, Manur, Tirunelveli. 3.The Public Works Department, Sitraru Vadinilakottam, Tenkasi. 4.The Village Assistant Officer, Vadakkuvagaiguam, Tirunelveli – 627 202. 5.The Village President, Vagaigulam, Tirunelveli District. 6.M/s.Pioneer Wincon, Represented by its Managing Director, Tamarai Tech Park, 7th Floor, 16-20A, SP Development Plot, Jawaharlal Nehru Salai, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to take action petitioner's representation dated 24.02.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jaisingh For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader for R.1 to R.4 No Appearance for R.5 & R.6
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.